<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The U.S. $1.4 billion military package to Mexico will soon be debated in Congress!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elenemigocomun.net/1477/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elenemigocomun.net/1477</link>
	<description>The Common Enemy y Oaxaqueñ@ Solidarity</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 12:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: robert o</title>
		<link>http://elenemigocomun.net/1477#comment-109443</link>
		<dc:creator>robert o</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 18:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elenemigocomun.net/1477#comment-109443</guid>
		<description>The Merida Initiative/Plan Mexico is precisely the wrong direction for U.S./Mexico relations to chart. Providing $1.4 billion to 
unaccountable Mexican security forces given "the depth of the drug cartel's penetration into seemingly every facet of the Mexican police, military, and judicial system" (Global Exchange) just does not make sense. In fact, according to Global Exchange, "as has been the case with Plan Colombia, there is great concern that Mexico could use their new equipment in counter-insurgency raids against both social movements and suspected guerrilla forces, mainly in Mexico's 
indigenous and highly marginalized south."

More here: http://www.globalexchange.org/countries/americas/mexico/planmexico

Many organizations including the United Steel Workers, WESPAC and Witness for Peace and dozens of Mexican human rights organizations are opposed to the Merida Initiative. While there is a clear need for and track record of success for U.S. demand reduction programs (as opposed to supply reduction/interdiction programs), the Bush Administration has cut these useful and effective programs and is proposing replacing them with a militarized drug interdiction model which would only increase the violence and power of the drug cartels while doing nothing to cut their source of power, i.e., demand for drugs in the United States. This is clear to organizations across the political spectrum, from the Drug Policy Alliance to the RAND Corporation. 

Real economic and rural development aid (for small businesses and small-scale farmers) in Mexico instead of the corporate-managed 'free' trade agreements would benefit the poor in Mexico thereby undercutting the influence of the cartels, promising a road out of poverty. Effective money laundering legislation and gun-running enforcement would also affect the narco-cartels. But the Merida Initiative ignores these important goals and instead repeats the focus on military interdiction of Plan Colombia while ignoring the impunity with which Mexican security forces, which routinely commit human rights abuses against marginalized populations and social movement members.

Last year 7 million Mexicans marched in the streets against neo-liberal trade model opposed by much of the country. The Merida Initiative would arm a government which refuses to hold its security forces accountable while it promotes a deeply unpopular economic model which benefits few and harms many Mexicans. This is a recipe for increasing repression, expansion of narco-trafficking, and increased violence. In short, Plan Mexico spells disaster for social and economic stability in the U.S. and Mexico.

Finally, Mexican President Calderon has allowed members of the extremist anti-semitic, homophobic, and virulent anti-woman's rights organization known as El Yunque to hold some of the highest positions of power in the Mexican government. The United States government should not be supporting any government which threatens to set the clock back on women's and gay rights or on religious tolerance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Merida Initiative/Plan Mexico is precisely the wrong direction for U.S./Mexico relations to chart. Providing $1.4 billion to<br />
unaccountable Mexican security forces given &#8220;the depth of the drug cartel&#8217;s penetration into seemingly every facet of the Mexican police, military, and judicial system&#8221; (Global Exchange) just does not make sense. In fact, according to Global Exchange, &#8220;as has been the case with Plan Colombia, there is great concern that Mexico could use their new equipment in counter-insurgency raids against both social movements and suspected guerrilla forces, mainly in Mexico&#8217;s<br />
indigenous and highly marginalized south.&#8221;</p>
<p>More here: <a href="http://www.globalexchange.org/countries/americas/mexico/planmexico" rel="nofollow">http://www.globalexchange.org/countries/americas/mexico/planmexico</a></p>
<p>Many organizations including the United Steel Workers, WESPAC and Witness for Peace and dozens of Mexican human rights organizations are opposed to the Merida Initiative. While there is a clear need for and track record of success for U.S. demand reduction programs (as opposed to supply reduction/interdiction programs), the Bush Administration has cut these useful and effective programs and is proposing replacing them with a militarized drug interdiction model which would only increase the violence and power of the drug cartels while doing nothing to cut their source of power, i.e., demand for drugs in the United States. This is clear to organizations across the political spectrum, from the Drug Policy Alliance to the RAND Corporation. </p>
<p>Real economic and rural development aid (for small businesses and small-scale farmers) in Mexico instead of the corporate-managed &#8216;free&#8217; trade agreements would benefit the poor in Mexico thereby undercutting the influence of the cartels, promising a road out of poverty. Effective money laundering legislation and gun-running enforcement would also affect the narco-cartels. But the Merida Initiative ignores these important goals and instead repeats the focus on military interdiction of Plan Colombia while ignoring the impunity with which Mexican security forces, which routinely commit human rights abuses against marginalized populations and social movement members.</p>
<p>Last year 7 million Mexicans marched in the streets against neo-liberal trade model opposed by much of the country. The Merida Initiative would arm a government which refuses to hold its security forces accountable while it promotes a deeply unpopular economic model which benefits few and harms many Mexicans. This is a recipe for increasing repression, expansion of narco-trafficking, and increased violence. In short, Plan Mexico spells disaster for social and economic stability in the U.S. and Mexico.</p>
<p>Finally, Mexican President Calderon has allowed members of the extremist anti-semitic, homophobic, and virulent anti-woman&#8217;s rights organization known as El Yunque to hold some of the highest positions of power in the Mexican government. The United States government should not be supporting any government which threatens to set the clock back on women&#8217;s and gay rights or on religious tolerance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerard Farell</title>
		<link>http://elenemigocomun.net/1477#comment-108430</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerard Farell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 01:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elenemigocomun.net/1477#comment-108430</guid>
		<description>I do not undestand your plan of not fighting drug traffic from its sources. Your oposition to Merida plan is shameful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not undestand your plan of not fighting drug traffic from its sources. Your oposition to Merida plan is shameful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eec</title>
		<link>http://elenemigocomun.net/1477#comment-107916</link>
		<dc:creator>eec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 05:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elenemigocomun.net/1477#comment-107916</guid>
		<description>From NAFTA to the SPP
Here comes the Security and Prosperity Partnership, but—what security? whose prosperity?
http://www.dollarsandsense.org/archives/2008/0108sciacchitano.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From NAFTA to the SPP<br />
Here comes the Security and Prosperity Partnership, but—what security? whose prosperity?<br />
<a href="http://www.dollarsandsense.org/archives/2008/0108sciacchitano.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.dollarsandsense.org/archives/2008/0108sciacchitano.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
